Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LTI-388, LTI-389, LTI-390: improvements and fixes to param forwarding #330

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

Mariam05
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mariam05 Mariam05 commented Jun 21, 2024

LTI-388: Looks for the parameters in the entire launch params hierarchy, rather than just the custom_params nested hash.
LTI-389: Stops storing the params to be sent to BBB in the room's settings column, but rather stores them in an instance variable.
LTI-390: This PR also fixes the issue in which the wrong data is sent to BBB when using shared rooms

@Mariam05 Mariam05 marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2024 12:36
config/application.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jfederico jfederico left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some observations

@Mariam05 Mariam05 changed the title LTI-389, LTI-390: move extra params from db to memory, send correct data to BBB on Shared Rooms LTI-388, LTI-389, LTI-390: move extra params from db to memory, send correct data to BBB on Shared Rooms, look for params in entire launch param hierarchy Jun 27, 2024
@Mariam05 Mariam05 changed the title LTI-388, LTI-389, LTI-390: move extra params from db to memory, send correct data to BBB on Shared Rooms, look for params in entire launch param hierarchy LTI-388, LTI-389, LTI-390: improvements and fixes to param forwarding Jun 27, 2024
@jfederico jfederico merged commit 88a88e9 into bigbluebutton:master Jun 28, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants